Friday, 31 January 2014

Developing views and perspectives on globalisation

This post is basically meant to serve as a curtain raiser to the students of global economic environment (GEE) at XIME,  motivating and leading them to appreciate the views of institutions that are promoting globalization through official and formal platforms and through the states.  A different perspective will be unfolded when we look at and understand the approaches that are advocated by peoples' organizations and individuals who put forward the other side of the coin. For the time being, this post seeks to address the former

While sieving through the resources available on globalization, i was reaching out to the core set of institutions meant to promote globalization, the world bank, the IMF, the WTO and few UN agencies - the UNDP, the UNCTAD, the UNESCO, the WHO and the FAO. Some of the recent publications that each of these institutions brought out, had interesting themes and content, which, i felt,  will help handhold students to seek basic information and  map the global economic environment at a very broad scale, and then depending upon the insights that are gathered, dwell deep into some of the critical aspects through further studies.

What do GPOs push through?
The focus was temporal… topical and driven by…
promoting an ideology and a concept of new world order… which was on an incremental basis; the issues shifted in tranche of 7-8 year cycles starting from 1990s, 2000s, 2010s …, commencing with economic reforms, privatisation of enterprise and trade; liberalisation of industrial and trade policies, fostering increased international - cross country trade, investment, technology transfer, skills development, migration and currency exchange easing out and sensitising the impact of exploitation of natural resources and driving the climate change mitigation efforts. 
—  These took support from accelerated trade relations of countries  in early  2000s with WTO becoming more influential and leading the corporate push for international business to grow, and support independent trade bodies such as WEF becoming the drivers of globalisation. 
However, the, 2010s took a turn to a more conservative approaches moving with the creation and supporting creation of (a) protective shield by various countries, (in their own ways), to hedge themselves from  2008-09 financial meltdown, with varied results. 
In a nutshell, one can broadly say that the GPOs acted in consonance  to create and engage with "The push and pull strategies", in the below directions. Their contributions, outputs and lobbying efrorts can be classified in a simple way, as below:
Writings on the wall
Hard core bargaining
Enablers and supportive clutches
Analyses and illustrators
Documentation and advocacy
Nurturing stakeholders
Developing connectivity and reciprocity
Creating and espousing thought leadership by identifying, inverting, subverting and tilting pyramidal thought processes


In the below paragraphs, these can be gleaned by some intense reading.  I am giving a list of the latest documents published by the GPOs. Their reading and analysis, i hope will help me develop  a basic but application orientation, a commentary on relevance and appropriateness of each of these documents - from my own limited understanding and the array of perspectives i could generate along with my students, will be posted in forthcoming posts.

The resources that I gathered were from thirteen institutions, grouped into eleven focus areas:

1. From UNDP:
  a. The Human Development Report 2013 - highlighting the theme "The Rise of South", hinting the progress made by developing countries in bringing a new canvas of development unfolded in global arena;
 b. what will it take to achieve MDG - giving a framework to hasten the implementation of MDG tools

2. From World Bank:
 a. The WDR 2014 - focusing on Risk Management as an emerging tool for development in the coming periods
 b.  The Global developmental horizons - thematic focus on capital for the future - savings and investment in inter-dependent world

3. From IMF:
 a. World Economic Outlook 2014 - an assessment of all countries' economic performance and forecasts for 2014
 b. Dancing Together - a report on how the 2008 financial crisis brought countries together in acting in unison in overcoming the same
 c. Global Financial Stability Report - that deals with the extent of recovery of world from the last decade's recession

4. From World Economic Forum:
 a. Global Risks Reporting 2013
 b. Global Competitiveness Reporting 2013
 c. Enabling Global Trade, thrust of 2013-14
 d. Creating Global Value Chains 2013
 e. Global IT Development Report 2013, each of which were highly compelling and business driving tools evolved and presented to foster global trade in a topical manner

5. From WTO, UNCTAD And OECD:
 a. UNCTAD - World Investment Report, 2013
 b. UNCTAD - World Trade and Development Report, 2013
 c. OECD - G20 and Developing Global Value Chains, 2013
 d. WTO Annual Report 2013
e. WTO - Agreements and Reviews of some major agreements
f. WTO - The toolkits for  - designing and implementing tariffs and for eliminating non-tariff barriers, policy making

6. From ADB:
 a. Asian Development Outlook, 2012.

While its a mammoth task to read all of these in a day or two, an attempt will be made to capture the salient aspects of teach of these reports in the coming few days and toss them for incisive analysis and class debates, I feel it is also necessary to access the following institutions' publications, so as to close the gaps in the perspectives for the global economic scenarios. They are:

7. From UNESCO - on state of the education across the globe and the challenges and new initiatives emerging;

8. From UNICEF - on issues related to gender and mother and child health;

9. From WHO - on issues related to global status of primary healthcare and advanced healthcare;

10. from FAO - on issues related to agriculture, forestry and sustainability of natural resources as well as poverty associated with rural and agrarian economies

11. from UNFCCC - on issues related to climate change, livelihoods and inter-relation between industry and individual from the point of view of tilted access to resources and mitigation and adoptation issues of exploitative use of natural resources and resultant climate change through people's action vis-a-vis corporate and state action

The purpose of this post is to share the perspectives these immense data bases provide - and also to - nudge the readers to share any other important and essential resources that need to be studied to learn the real picture of global economic environment.

Hope to catchup soon, giving few pointers from each of the above and other resources and throw open the discussions on what do they mean, hint and lead us to work on.
.

Wednesday, 22 January 2014

curtain raiser for the global economic environment

(Prologue:

This blog is mainly to serve the purpose of being a mirror to me while delivering a course on Global Economic Environment to the first year students of MBA. As such, there will be attempts to share my personal views and musings that emerge out of the joys of doing this course and spending time with some of the brilliant and enthusiastic and pragmatic students who have chosen to do this journey together and share the joys and frustrations of the learning process!)

Introduction:

the course opens with a broad but relevant introduction to the course, by listing its objectives and pedagogies

the course leads the class to study four dimensions of Global Economic Environment
1. the processes of globalization; the flows and directions of the flows and implications
2. Bretton wood institutions and their role in shaping global economic policies and globalization itself - positive and negative influences and countries' response
3. International trade and methods of international trade - foreign exchange and currency determinants - tariffs and their role in managing favourable trade
4. international economic theories and their role in shaping a country's trade policies and relations

the above needs to be supported by understanding the concerns of the countries and their interests and role in participating in creating a New Global Economic Order.

In order to study the subject, it is proposed to study two countries each from different economic/ global stand
- from Developed Countries - say, Sweden and New Zealand or Canada and Denmark
- from emerging economies - Brazil and South Africa - China and Mexico
- from transition economies -  Russia and Poland - Georgia and Armenia
- newly industrialized economies - Taiwan and Malaysia - South Korea and Thailand
- middle income economies - Turkey and UAE or  Kuwait and Greece
- least developed economies - Bangladesh and Sudan - Yemen and Honduras

The methodology to study these countries from a Global Economci Environment perspective would eb brought in using the frameworks proposed by leading globalization stalwarts and taking the premsie of HDR's focus in addressing poverty and economic prosperity.

If the course achieves these tenets of learning, it would be making significant contribution to the role this course is assigned with.